News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:About Coding House (2014) by wyc on Tuesday May 05, 2015 @04:02PM (#9494602)
> 50% is untrue and students fault

This statement does little to make me feel any better about Coding House.

Re:About Coding House (2014) by joshrotenberg on Tuesday May 05, 2015 @04:21PM (#9494708)
Should be more like "We take 100% responsibility for the issues and plan to do something about it."
Re:About Coding House (2014) by cansync1 on Tuesday May 05, 2015 @04:30PM (#9494771)
Fair enough.

We take 100% responsibility for taking a student in our first cohort over 1 year ago; who was not prepared, did not do the work in or after the program.

We have learned from our mistake.

We now have extensive per work, coding challenges (gates on all phases) and accept only 3.16% of the students that apply.

Re:About Coding House (2014) by GFK_of_xmaspast on Tuesday May 05, 2015 @05:47PM (#9495202)
That's like a little kid who, when told to make an apology, says "I'm sorry you're so ugly."
Re:About Coding House (2014) by markrote on Tuesday May 05, 2015 @04:34PM (#9494791)
Wow, I think that response was even worse. Blaming the student even more.

PS: Hi Josh!

Re:About Coding House (2014) by caffeinewriter on Tuesday May 05, 2015 @06:08PM (#9495314)
That is perhaps the most passive aggressive "apology" I've ever seen.
Re:About Coding House (2014) by brookside on Tuesday May 05, 2015 @06:35PM (#9495437)
The first rule of apologies is it's only ok to apologize for your own actions, not the behavior or feelings of others.
Re:About Coding House (2014) by Yhippa on Tuesday May 05, 2015 @05:01PM (#9494945)
Why not round it down to an even 3.14% and keep it at Pi?