News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Let's Package JQuery: A JavaScript Packaging Dystopian No... by nailer on Saturday May 02, 2015 @04:57AM (#9476385)
To always use the same versions of every dependency you'll want to shrink wrap.

And yes, of course dependencies have dependencies. Software depends on other software. All packaging systems have a tree of dependencies.

Re:Let's Package JQuery: A JavaScript Packaging Dystopian No... by davexunit on Saturday May 02, 2015 @08:44AM (#9476851)
>To always use the same versions of every dependency you'll want to shrink wrap.

Does "shrink wrap" mean "bundle"? If so, I strongly disagree. It's possible to explicitly use the exact same versions of dependencies without resorting to bundling all the source/binaries. Guix and Nix are particularly well suited for this.

>And yes, of course dependencies have dependencies.

But you have to admit that the depth of this dependency tree is insane.

Re:Let's Package JQuery: A JavaScript Packaging Dystopian No... by nailer on Saturday May 02, 2015 @12:15PM (#9477546)
I mean npm shrinkwrap.

Depth of tree is reasonable: if you install them at the top.