Re:Four MLs (and a Python)
by sgoody on Thursday April 30, 2015 @08:42AM
(#9464674)
I enjoyed reading this and I'm not bothered about tweaking the solutions into oblivion to eke out performance gains. This is a nice, simple comparison, with performance being a simple demonstration of code written by one author.
The only thing that seems to be an obvious omission is the omission of Haskell.
The only thing that seems to be an obvious omission is the omission of Haskell.