Re:Nagios vs Icinga: the story of one of the most heated for...
by newsvatore on Tuesday April 28, 2015 @07:06PM
(#9455647)
Nope. Never seemed appealing to me, as I have easily installed Nagios with the graphing plugins and other added features in the past by hand - for a few companies at least.
One of the biggest wins of Icinga2 for Nagios shops is the fact that it can be sort of retrofitted to work with your existing Nagios hosts using NRPE.
Of course, NRPE is highly insecure and this is not recommended, blah blah, but it works, and I'm sure there are more than just a few people still using and older version of NRPE in production.
Re:Nagios vs Icinga: the story of one of the most heated for...
by MichaelGG on Tuesday April 28, 2015 @02:41PM
(#9454344)
Oh, hmm I think that might be a new limitation then. (Which only makes sense since they gotta make money somehow...)
Re:Nagios vs Icinga: the story of one of the most heated for...
by voidz on Tuesday April 28, 2015 @03:46PM
(#9454680)
25 hosts: free.
26 hosts: high costs.
Yeah, they could make that more appealing :)
Re:Nagios vs Icinga: the story of one of the most heated for...
by dvanduzer on Tuesday April 28, 2015 @04:32PM
(#9454975)
If you are worried about spending money when expanding to 26 hosts, you aren't their market anyway. If you're worried about spending a few grand on monitoring for around ~100 hosts or more, then you have a very strange business model.
Re:Nagios vs Icinga: the story of one of the most heated for...
by brianwawok on Tuesday April 28, 2015 @09:11PM
(#9456026)
The problem is 26 bare metal servers is very different from 26 VPSes.
It's only free for up to 25 hosts. Then it costs at least $65/mo (for up to 250 hosts) plus the fees for extra features.