Re:Your body wasn’t built to last: a lesson from human morta...
by jessriedel on Tuesday April 21, 2015 @01:32PM
(#9415623)
Do they successfully predict any data besides the super-exponential decay?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Your body wasn’t built to last: a lesson from human morta...
by jostmey on Tuesday April 21, 2015 @01:41PM
(#9415695)
I think I can do better. Michael Rose breed fruit flies selecting for longevity. I believed his work showed that it was possible to extend lifespan simply by introducing the right selective pressure. If this doesn't demonstrate that aging is the result of Evolutionary processes, I don't know what will.
Here's his profile: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=NCQ3E5sAAAAJ&hl=en...
Re:Your body wasn’t built to last: a lesson from human morta...
by jessriedel on Tuesday April 21, 2015 @02:40PM
(#9416053)
No one reasonably disputes that aging is the result of an evolutionary process. But that's a far cry from explaining exactly "why we see super-exponential decay in mortality distributions".