Well, if you take the maxim of propertarianism to its limit, then you should be able to exclude anyone for any reason. This is what people like, e.g. Hans Hermann-Hoppe advocate, with proposals of anarcho-capitalist societies that end up sounding like isolationist dystopias. His views on democracy are interesting, however.

Either that or I suppose not even libertarianism can trump Balkan relations.

That latter is a force to be reckoned with.

In theory, but for an early country it's a long shot. With many races, you'd have to handle many different cultures and give out some of that freedom in exchange for equality.

They also don't accept nobody with a criminal record. Like everybody who was convicted of a crime is a danger to society.

They are liberals not libertarians.

The word 'liberal' in a European context ranges in meaning, and often encompasses many aspects of what those in the US would recognize as 'libertarian'. It just really depends on the context though. Depending on the country, 'liberalism' may be associated with center-left, center-right, or both (see UK LibDems as an example). In general, though, it is typically used in contrast to both right wing conservative parties and left wing social-democratic parties.

They are not liberals. Not even the most hardcore European liberals would say these things:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V%C3%ADt_Jedli%C4%8Dka#Quotes

You are probably right, two very completely different ideologies.

There are a lot more than two ideologies in those terms.

What, you expect consistency from libertarians? ;)