Re:WikiLeaks publishes 30,000 leaked Sony documents
by Lawtonfogle on Friday April 17, 2015 @09:40AM
(#9394186)
I'd willingly make that sacrifice if the emails of the corrupt in power were also published.
Re:WikiLeaks publishes 30,000 leaked Sony documents
by res0nat0r on Friday April 17, 2015 @11:41AM
(#9395011)
Who exactly at Sony has been "corrupt in power"?
Re:WikiLeaks publishes 30,000 leaked Sony documents
by rjaco31 on Friday April 17, 2015 @11:56AM
(#9395128)
The one that managed the FBI to give them a cover story with the whole "North Korea" stuff might be a good start.
Re:WikiLeaks publishes 30,000 leaked Sony documents
by Aldo_MX on Friday April 17, 2015 @09:47AM
(#9394229)
If your YC funded company engaged in illegal activities, why not?
Re:WikiLeaks publishes 30,000 leaked Sony documents
by res0nat0r on Friday April 17, 2015 @11:42AM
(#9395017)
What exactly was Sony doing illegally that this leak apparently exposed?
Re:WikiLeaks publishes 30,000 leaked Sony documents
by krapp on Friday April 17, 2015 @01:03PM
(#9395635)
"If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men,
I will find something in them which will hang him."
Sony Pictures is the American subsidiary of a multinational corporation - merely by virtue of their size and power, they have to be guilty of something.
Re:WikiLeaks publishes 30,000 leaked Sony documents
by task_queue on Friday April 17, 2015 @01:24PM
(#9395782)
The reason for the link is _right_ there in the intro, assuming you clicked the link.
Sony has been engaged in some questionable activity with questionable organizations making questionable deals. The reason is transparency so illegal activity can be exposed.
Would it be appropriate for all YC funded companies to have all of their emails published on WikiLeaks tomorrow?
If not, what's the difference, and where do you draw the line?