Would you (do you?) trust your company's source code to github?

Re:Would you (do you?) trust your company's source code to g... by icefox on Wednesday November 11, 2009 @11:20PM (#937079)

How much would you be willing to pay? How about $3600.00? Would that be too much? Is it the per user cost of fi that is too much or just the overall cost? What if the $3600 included as many users/repos as you wanted (given your hd space) and 1 year of free upgrades.

How about $999.99 (same as Adobe Photoshop so it should only require middle management approval)? What if you got a box like the yellow google search box (it could be called that the "premium version")?

An unknown factor in all this is how many companies would be even interested in buying a github server in the first place. If it isn't that many the costs might be too low to sustain development. I am betting that for the GitHub guys it makes a ton of sense for them to sell the private small accounts on github (and only manage/fix 1 github version). and for the big guys sell them a big package.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Would you (do you?) trust your company's source code to g... by turbinemonkey on Thursday November 12, 2009 @07:09AM (#937586)

Fundamentally, we don't want any hardware on-premise at all. What we really want is some kind of real statement from the github guys that speaks to all of the issues raised here (encryption, theft, malicious injection, auditing, the "honeypot"/juicy target problem, etc?), as I suggest to PJ below.

I'm guessing that's not going to happen, so I suppose our options are the status quo, host in a less-conspicuous location and manage our own security (as best as one can in a hosted environment), or go with the crowd and seek safety in that quasi-anonymity.

[ Parent | on HN ]