Re:Do people think it would be helpful if YC gave a rating t...
by nickhuh on Monday April 13, 2015 @05:07PM
(#9370513)
Interesting point. Still, I think even some really coarse feedback would be helpful. For example, just a three tiered system where a 1 means you get an interview, a 2 means your startup is interesting, and a 3 meaning that it's totally off-base would be helpful, cause if I keep throwing 3's YC's way, I'd rather just not waste their (or my) time.
Re:Do people think it would be helpful if YC gave a rating t...
by benologist on Monday April 13, 2015 @05:35PM
(#9370661)
They explicitly want people to try again, some of their biggest successes were accepted "eventually".
Many of our successful founders applied multiple times
before we funded them (including Drew Houston of Dropbox).
http://blog.samaltman.com/applying-to-ycI think they would be very hesitant to call any ideas terrible - recently they instigated changes here in comments outlawing "gratuitous negativity" and one of the stated reasons was they don't want to risk people abandoning ideas because of criticism -
New work and new ideas are fragile. Too much gratuitous
negativity might be the difference between someone giving
up on a crazy idea and building the next Airbnb.
http://blog.ycombinator.com/new-hacker-news-guidelineRejections won't always be actionable reasons or even you/your idea/your team, you're also being measured against everyone else's applications and YC's collective experience and knowledge of ~700 other startups.
I don't think it would be very helpful for that reason, as well as a general inability to quantify success and failure even amongst the startups they do fund.