News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Game of Thrones leak and watermark: a stupid tracking system by anigbrowl on Monday April 13, 2015 @02:55PM (#9369608)
Yes, I know that - I work in film and post-production for a living and I can explain the origin and workflow aspects of video frame rates to you in excruciating detail.

You know how annoying it is when you watch a movie and there's some sort of 2-dimensional 'hacker' character and s/he just says some gobbledegook about 'hacking the password' or whatever, you see something a progress bar briefly on screen, and then the actor says 'we're in!' In short, how stupid movies can be about computer topics? Well that's how it feels when someone who knows nothing about video formats or editing comes up with suggestions about adjusting the length between scenes by a few milliseconds and having it slightly different for every viewer.

Re:Game of Thrones leak and watermark: a stupid tracking system by chillingeffect on Monday April 13, 2015 @03:33PM (#9369860)
This is a good time to bring up the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect(xhe).

It's where you read a page full of comments about something you really and truly deep know something about and see how very, every wrong nearly everyone is...

...then you go on to take every other page pretty seriously without remembering just how far off people were on the topic that you know about. I experienced this the other day when people were talking about beep.js on HN.

(xhe) http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/65213-briefly-stated-the-gel...

Re:Game of Thrones leak and watermark: a stupid tracking system by imron on Monday April 13, 2015 @10:36PM (#9371809)
> This is a good time to bring up the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect

Thanks. Now I know the name for this.

Re:Game of Thrones leak and watermark: a stupid tracking system by RyJones on Monday April 13, 2015 @03:28PM (#9369832)
thank you
[deleted]
Re:Game of Thrones leak and watermark: a stupid tracking system by anigbrowl on Monday April 13, 2015 @07:46PM (#9371244)
I'm not wrong. Not because such things aren't possible (duh, we have cameras that can do varying frame rates), but because I am aware that content creators contract to deliver a product that will play back properly anywhere. Distributors' deliverables lists specify the exact frame and sample rates that they want, as opposed to what's potentially achievable within the format. Handing them something encoded with variable frame rate is going to result in automatic rejection.

Here's an example of a deliverables manual, from Netflix: http://newworlddistro.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/FullTec... You will get something similar from any broadcaster or video distributor. I'm not making careless extrapolations of my knowledge here, but telling you what the industry standards are. I have long involved email conversations about these things with distributors so that stuff I submit to them doesn't get sent back, triggering contractual penalty clauses for late/non-delivery that will make a producer cross with me.