The developer of the Java solution posted something I'd consider reasonably representative of the Java I would likely encounter from most Java programmers and I while I have almost no personal experience with Ruby, I have the feeling the Ruby solution is reasonably close to what Ruby programmers write.
While you can write concise code in any language, it seems few Java programmers bother to.
Perhaps you should submit your solution to the original site: http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/
Sorry for initially assuming that you wrote the code. I wasn't familiar with that site, so I didn't register your original allusion to it.
Also, I think your statement that conciseness is inversely proportional to speed is rarely true. It certainly doesn't hold for the programming examples at the shootout site.
First, in order to get an objective comparison of code length you should at least use the same (length) variable names. You used "lineTokenizer" in your Java example and "l" in your Ruby example!
Second, you could have just written System.out.println(sum) in Java. The fact that you had to write System.out.println(Integer.toString(sum)) shows your lack of basic Java knowledge.
Lastly, the brackets around your one-line while loop in Java are unnecessary, unlike the brackets around your closure in Ruby.
Also, the Java main method declaration is irrelevant to your point, since it's written only once per program, and is automatically created by any IDE.
How about this equivalent Java code to match your Ruby example:
Not so different now, is it? You can write concise code in any language if you know how to use it.