Re:Why do some developers consider Agile development to be n...
by jackmaney on Monday April 13, 2015 @11:45AM
(#9368268)
In every implementation of agile that I've ever seen or encountered, something like this occurs:
"Okay, this story for Feature X, how many points should we give it?"
"Well, it'll probably take N days, so, let's say, M points."
Eventually, for the sake of consistency, a rough translation between points and time intervals is established.
There also should be an open recognition that your actual velocity will vary somewhat between sprints. One goal is to reduce that variability by improving your estimation (with practice!), but you anticipate and prepare for the variability. That's why you have a backlog (in case you need more work) and why you develop units of work that are independent (in case you need to push one).
For all these reasons it's a mistake to think of an equivalence at the level of tasks such as one day is three points or something like that.