Re:State of the art of random double generation
by ZoFreX on Sunday April 12, 2015 @10:48AM
(#9363499)
I made a mistake in my comment. It should say that any particular floating number is no more likely to be picked than any other with the same exponent. (I think that's right? So basically any representable number could be chosen, but ones in 'sparser' rangers will be more likely to be picked than a single number in a 'denser' range)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.