News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GNOME 3.16 on OpenBSD [video] by jstanek on Saturday April 11, 2015 @05:24PM (#9360907)
GNOME has had systemd as a hard dependency since 2012: it uses systemd-logind and a few other systemd services for its basic functionality. systemd is only available on Linux systems, therefore it's a pretty great achievement to get it running on OpenBSD.
Re:GNOME 3.16 on OpenBSD [video] by peveechi on Saturday April 11, 2015 @07:12PM (#9361204)
That sounds a bit misleading. I remember running Gnome 3.2/3.4 in 2012, while still using SysV init. I'm not sure whether logind or ConsoleKit was used, but the init system (what most people associate with the name "systemd") was definitely not the one from systemd.
Re:GNOME 3.16 on OpenBSD [video] by brynet on Saturday April 11, 2015 @05:28PM (#9360915)
OpenBSD's port of GNOME3 does not rely on systemd at all.
Re:GNOME 3.16 on OpenBSD [video] by Narishma on Saturday April 11, 2015 @06:05PM (#9361037)
I don't think he said otherwise.
Re:GNOME 3.16 on OpenBSD [video] by jdub on Saturday April 11, 2015 @08:33PM (#9361458)
The poster said "hard dependency". This is false.
Re:GNOME 3.16 on OpenBSD [video] by bandrami on Saturday April 11, 2015 @11:47PM (#9362054)
The unpatched GNOME post 3.12 or so does have a hard dependency, which is why platforms like OpenBSD or Slackware have to patch. If it requires a patch to work around, it's a hard dependency.
Re:GNOME 3.16 on OpenBSD [video] by yarrel on Saturday April 11, 2015 @09:26PM (#9361615)
It's true.

I love unsupported assertion day!

Re:GNOME 3.16 on OpenBSD [video] by javert on Saturday April 11, 2015 @06:37PM (#9361107)
Thanks. Just the kind of explanation I was looking for.