If the OP is claiming copyright they only need to claim the year of original publication. Technically, not even that. To print the copyright as the current year doesn't make sense. Unless: - The copyright is on specific content, made in the year indicated. - The content is substantially revised (should just add a year, not replace it.).

For the entire website as an entity, 2015 is fine as the copyright notice and original date of publication.

That's my understanding anyway. Not legal advice.

Thanks :) I fixed this mistake: https://github.com/josephernest/void/commit/43623c00c1c7264e...