Re:China's Great Cannon
by fweespeech on Friday April 10, 2015 @09:47AM
(#9354202)
Yeah, if GitHub had used a 301 Moved Permanently to some Chinese website I think it would have been interesting [rather than responding with the alert message]....however that probably would be deemed "attacking" someone.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
It would've been interesting if they had made the 301 point back to Baidu.
Re:China's Great Cannon
by Sanddancer on Saturday April 11, 2015 @12:46AM
(#9358542)
While fun, it almost certainly would have resulted in China moving to the Syn flood stage faster. That being said, I'm always a fan of the classics, and would have probably gone for a redirect to goatse or the like. Given that the script was giving github full control of the page, a bit of shock and awe would have been rather fun.
Not really it's technically deflecting the attack back at your opponent just like martial arts. I would more likely call it active defense. :)
Note: Journalists whil always go for the sensational that's no reason not to do it.
Re:China's Great Cannon
by fweespeech on Friday April 10, 2015 @10:17AM
(#9354434)
Do you honestly believe that is how the average journalist would report it and the general population would perceive it?
'cause I immediately see headlines like:
"Github hacks China over censorship!"