"I have already used the name Go for *MY* programming language"

Re:"I have already used the name Go for *MY* programming lan... by martingordon on Wednesday November 11, 2009 @06:26AM (#935075)

Except that ! is silent, unlike ++ and #.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:"I have already used the name Go for *MY* programming lan... by twinwing on Wednesday November 11, 2009 @06:53AM (#935098)

Go Bang works

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:"I have already used the name Go for *MY* programming lan... by pbhjpbhj on Wednesday November 11, 2009 @08:21AM (#935175)

Is that like "go forth and procreate", to use another euphemism.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:"I have already used the name Go for *MY* programming lan... by gaius on Wednesday November 11, 2009 @09:17AM (#935271)

The name "forth" is already in use for a programming language.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:"I have already used the name Go for *MY* programming lan... by jister on Wednesday November 11, 2009 @09:46AM (#935319)

...and this will GO ON forever, you know.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:"I have already used the name Go for *MY* programming lan... by tsestrich on Wednesday November 11, 2009 @08:23AM (#935179)

You could read Go! as "go not" :)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:"I have already used the name Go for *MY* programming lan... by joubert on Wednesday November 11, 2009 @06:53AM (#935097)

Go-bang? (and in this case the question mark is silent)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:"I have already used the name Go for *MY* programming lan... by santry on Wednesday November 11, 2009 @08:28AM (#935189)

Is that like Go‽

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:"I have already used the name Go for *MY* programming lan... by mattchew on Wednesday November 11, 2009 @09:18AM (#935273)

In which case McCabe may find himself in trouble with Shriekback.

[ Parent | on HN ]