"Sorry, but this is like posting jQuery. Who doesn't know about three.js?"
Well, I didn't know about three.js before I submitted it. I did know about jquery, but I was curious to see if it had ever been submitted, and the easiest way to find out was to submit it. So here it is.
And who knows, maybe there are HN readers who haven't heard of jquery. Stranger things have happened.
Re:JQuery
by vorotato on Tuesday April 07, 2015 @01:43PM
(#9335713)
Beefing up the server cannot improve client side code. Jquery is quite slow, nice, but quite slow. Sometimes writing out those 8 lines can make your code literally 400 times faster.(source : http://vanilla-js.com/) So yes if performance is a concern, you might want to look at writing it yourself.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9333859
"Sorry, but this is like posting jQuery. Who doesn't know about three.js?"
Well, I didn't know about three.js before I submitted it. I did know about jquery, but I was curious to see if it had ever been submitted, and the easiest way to find out was to submit it. So here it is.
And who knows, maybe there are HN readers who haven't heard of jquery. Stranger things have happened.
Especially when the 8-line version might need testing in every possible browser out there for quirks and bugs. jQuery's already done the legwork there
Edit:
youmightnotnotneedjquery.com linked in a sibling of this comment explains it better in this googledoc
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LPaPA30bLUB_publLIMF0Rlh...
Specifically in cases where other optimizations (caching, beefier servers, faster SQL, SSDs vs HDDs, etc) didn't help more?
[1] Responsive as in "Mozilla Firefox is not responding", not as in "Responsive Design".