News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Should I use K&R to learn C? by VLM on Tuesday April 07, 2015 @10:10AM (#9334122)
A small detail that has been missed by most responses to the question is OP isn't asking how to learn how to write the best possible 2015 C code for 2015 C tasks, but asked for reverse engineering previously written code (perhaps written VERY long ago).

Depending on the age and quality of the code OP is reverse engineering, learning a very modern style of coding might somewhat oppose OPs goal.

I'd advise OP to rephrase the question to something like "I really want to learn how unixv6 works as a retro computing hobby project and I want to know what books the authors of unixv6 originally read to learn C". Or "I want to eventually be able to reverse engineer stereotypical 90s/00s microcontroller code so I want to know what textbooks an average EE used to learn C in that era"

Re:Ask HN: Should I use K&R to learn C? by __revrs__ on Tuesday April 07, 2015 @11:44AM (#9334836)
hmm, I think my question is fine how it is. I want to learn C, I am asking HN their opinion of a book I am thinking about. If you want specifics, I would revise my question to something like "I really want to learn how to reverse engineer malware so I'm starting this goal by learning C, is K&R a good resource to learn C from?"
Re:Ask HN: Should I use K&R to learn C? by VLM on Tuesday April 07, 2015 @02:00PM (#9335832)
What kind of C? 1980s K+R or 2015 or ...

Its like the difference between "Programming Perl" 1st edition manual and 2014 edition of "Modern Perl"