News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Anonabox Analysis by lbthomsen on Monday April 06, 2015 @02:17PM (#9329703)
I wrote that analysis and honestly - no - I don't think it's malicious. Incompetent perhaps, but not malicious.
Re:Anonabox Analysis by asherlangton on Monday April 06, 2015 @02:23PM (#9329761)
I should clarify: I don't think they're adding backdoors maliciously. It's their conduct -- proceeding despite the concerns raised, attacking critics, etc. -- that is greedy and malicious.
Re:Anonabox Analysis by lbthomsen on Monday April 06, 2015 @02:26PM (#9329782)
Now, that I am inclined to agree with :) And fact is - using the device as shipped to us is more dangerous than not using it at all. Anybody within WiFi range can basically do whatever they want.
Re:Anonabox Analysis by rst on Monday April 06, 2015 @04:03PM (#9330385)
This is an arena in which malice could plausibly try to disguise itself as incompetence. It's fine to give people the benefit of that doubt, but it is a doubt.