News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Announcing Rust 1.0 Beta by kibwen on Saturday April 04, 2015 @07:17PM (#9322551)
Not only are all your points about Rust incorrect, but numerous people in both this thread and past threads have repeatedly told you why they your points are incorrect and yet you persist in believing that they have been unaddressed. At this point it's safe to say that observers have caught on to your campaign of indefatigable misinformation and find it easier to downvote your comments than to waste any more of their time making arguments that you will proceed to blithely ignore.

In fact, it says a lot about Rust's culture that people were willing to engage you constructively in the first place despite your acerbic and technically-naive ramblings.

[dead]
Re:Announcing Rust 1.0 Beta by Ygg2 on Sunday April 05, 2015 @02:19PM (#9324861)
Wow. That response was... Childish.

I might agree Rust might need improvement in some areas but I don't agree with your sentiment or tone.

Not to mention you are quite puzzlingly wrong on many accounts.

Re:Announcing Rust 1.0 Beta by frowaway001 on Sunday April 05, 2015 @03:33PM (#9325063)
> Not to mention you are quite puzzlingly wrong on many accounts.

I'd love to see an example where this is the case.

Re:Announcing Rust 1.0 Beta by Ygg2 on Monday April 06, 2015 @04:59PM (#9330661)
The most egregious is [] is used for Thing A/ Thing B.

Another is Python underscore syntax being less readable.