New Hacker News Guideline: Avoid Gratuitous Negativity

Re:New Hacker News Guideline: Avoid Gratuitous Negativity by whybroke on Friday April 03, 2015 @06:52PM (#9319058)

I have noticed this too and have a humble suggestion: down-votes should require a comment from the down-voter. This would have the following advantages:

- The extra effort will slow down causal unthoughtful down-votes.

- If there is no justification, the down-voter can be down-voted in turn presumably by a greater degree.

- Any pattern of abuse can easily be seen in user profiles.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:New Hacker News Guideline: Avoid Gratuitous Negativity by seri on Sunday April 05, 2015 @02:20AM (#9323297)

I like advantages (1) and (3). I have a bad feeling about (2), however. And there is one immediate disadvantage I can think of: the required comments for down-voting would dilute the average karma, which is important for some people.

One solution is to treat comments that explain down-votes differently than normal comments. That would complicate the system a bit but maybe it will be worth it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:New Hacker News Guideline: Avoid Gratuitous Negativity by jraedisch on Saturday April 04, 2015 @05:02AM (#9320409)

Another advantage would be better feedback for the downvoted. Don't knowing why I was downvoted routinely drives me nuts.

[ Parent | on HN ]