Re:New Hacker News Guideline: Avoid Gratuitous Negativity
by r00fus on Friday April 03, 2015 @06:01PM
(#9318860)
Part of that though is that +1 Funny doesn't add to your slashdot karma. So people sometimes "upvote to denigrate" because you can only get +5 anyway, a silly comment can get +5 Funny without actually rewarding the commenter (mocks the comment) - you can see this when replies get +5 Insightful or +5 Informative and are very contrary to the original comment.
Personally, I like the idea of having qualifiers on the downvote without one on the upvote - makes you think a little bit before downvoting... plus the vote buttons are ridiculously small on an mobile Safari - so having to click twice would prevent accidental downvotes.
Re:New Hacker News Guideline: Avoid Gratuitous Negativity
by dragonwriter on Friday April 03, 2015 @05:05PM
(#9318528)
So far, while it may not be ideal, I think HN actually hits pretty close to the sweet spot.
Re:New Hacker News Guideline: Avoid Gratuitous Negativity
by bengali3 on Friday April 03, 2015 @04:40PM
(#9318365)
thanks i'll check it out. I wasn't thinking to show the stats to others, possibly to provide feedback to the poster that they're 'above average' on the 'mean' or 'not relevant', etc scale.
What generally happens is that instead of one argument about been downvoted/upvoted you end up with even more arguments about whether something is +5 funny or whatever.
I've no idea how you solve this in the general case tbh.