News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New Hacker News Guideline: Avoid Gratuitous Negativity by noir_lord on Friday April 03, 2015 @04:36PM (#9318343)
Slashdot does this.

What generally happens is that instead of one argument about been downvoted/upvoted you end up with even more arguments about whether something is +5 funny or whatever.

I've no idea how you solve this in the general case tbh.

Re:New Hacker News Guideline: Avoid Gratuitous Negativity by r00fus on Friday April 03, 2015 @06:01PM (#9318860)
Part of that though is that +1 Funny doesn't add to your slashdot karma. So people sometimes "upvote to denigrate" because you can only get +5 anyway, a silly comment can get +5 Funny without actually rewarding the commenter (mocks the comment) - you can see this when replies get +5 Insightful or +5 Informative and are very contrary to the original comment.

Personally, I like the idea of having qualifiers on the downvote without one on the upvote - makes you think a little bit before downvoting... plus the vote buttons are ridiculously small on an mobile Safari - so having to click twice would prevent accidental downvotes.

Re:New Hacker News Guideline: Avoid Gratuitous Negativity by dragonwriter on Friday April 03, 2015 @05:05PM (#9318528)
So far, while it may not be ideal, I think HN actually hits pretty close to the sweet spot.
Re:New Hacker News Guideline: Avoid Gratuitous Negativity by bengali3 on Friday April 03, 2015 @04:40PM (#9318365)
thanks i'll check it out. I wasn't thinking to show the stats to others, possibly to provide feedback to the poster that they're 'above average' on the 'mean' or 'not relevant', etc scale.