Re:Fish Oil Claims Not Supported by Research
by lanaius on Wednesday April 01, 2015 @03:21PM
(#9306130)
Dietary supplements are, if anything, not low profit.
Re:Fish Oil Claims Not Supported by Research
by scott_s on Wednesday April 01, 2015 @05:30PM
(#9307055)
Indeed. To close the loop, for those who don't see it: the companies that make "dietary supplements" have all the same incentives that Big Pharma does.
Re:Fish Oil Claims Not Supported by Research
by WalterSear on Wednesday April 01, 2015 @02:40PM
(#9305824)
And I've taken it daily, in sufficient quantities, for several months at a time, without noticing any difference at all.
Re:Fish Oil Claims Not Supported by Research
by moveroovee on Wednesday April 01, 2015 @04:53PM
(#9306797)
Did you consider quality as well as quantity?
Re:Fish Oil Claims Not Supported by Research
by WalterSear on Wednesday April 01, 2015 @04:56PM
(#9306817)
Yes, I compared brands and didn't buy cheap stuff.
This is why I take it as well. Its incredible how well it works. I hate to engage in conspiratorial thinking, but some of these overly critical analysis really seem to be coming from a big pharma "tell them the shit doesn't work" perspective. In a country with for-profit medicine, non-patented or low-profit treatments often get demonized. Especially by "useful idiots" who follow this ultra skeptical mindset where only what they hear from an authority like the government or academia, has any real value. They refuse to believe these institutions can have institutional fraud, incompetence, groupthink, or unfair motivators to getting published. As someone who works in a healthcare related field, its pretty obvious that industry controls the narrative, at least to me.
Or can be gamed by private industry and other benefactors who have a bias or agenda.