Re:“We have decided not to integrate the Dart VM into Chrome”
by untog on Wednesday March 25, 2015 @03:33PM
(#9265347)
100% sure it's a typo of "optional types".
Re:“We have decided not to integrate the Dart VM into Chrome”
by hibbelig on Wednesday March 25, 2015 @04:23PM
(#9265675)
How boring :-) I'd love to look forward to a language with optical types. I'm sure it's at least as interesting as operand overloading in Intercal.
Re:“We have decided not to integrate the Dart VM into Chrome”
by hmsimha on Wednesday March 25, 2015 @05:10PM
(#9265938)
Optical typing must be like duck typing taken to the extreme. If it looks like a duck then it's a duck, dammit!
Re:“We have decided not to integrate the Dart VM into Chrome”
by girvo on Wednesday March 25, 2015 @08:28PM
(#9267023)
Type coercion taken way too far ;)
Re:“We have decided not to integrate the Dart VM into Chrome”
by kyllo on Wednesday March 25, 2015 @04:48PM
(#9265821)
I was imagining something like Lens in Haskell :)
Re:“We have decided not to integrate the Dart VM into Chrome”
by DonHopkins on Wednesday March 25, 2015 @08:47PM
(#9267093)
Optical types are when they shave the bushy hair off of the type system, and it looks an inch longer.
What are optical types? I've never heard of this term and Google turned up nothing on it.