The questions that I see coming from amichail are either questions that have no real, objective answer (Are parents essentially AI researchers? Why not turn twitter into a massive brain for problem solving / brainstorming? Should games like The Sims be banned?) or questions where the best way to get an answer is to just be scientific about it and create an experiment - Would presenting less evidence for evolution convince more people? Allow PhDs to apply for expert status in various subreddits?. This is why I think they are inane. It's not about asking questions. It's about making the right ones.
-----
Whenever I'm around a child that keeps asking me questions, my standard response is "I don't know. How can we figure that out?". It usually works. If it's genuine curiosity, then they will be really excited to be able to take part in the discovery. If they were just trying to be annoying or looking for an easy answer, then they just forget about it and move on.
I don't think Amichail is inane. Inane is defined as "empty", "vain" or "lacking of meaning". I recognise the behaviour Amichail is displaying, "continuously asking lots of questions". As a kid I did this. I asked so many questions I distinctly remember my old man telling me to shut-up. So I did. Then had the problem of teachers asking me why I never bothered asking for help. In the real world continuously asking questions and being curious seems stupid, pointless and suppressed.
HN isn't a slice of the regular world. Tolerance of eccentric and unusual behaviour strengthens HN not weakens it. So let Amichail ask as many questions as possible, don't suppress the questioning, it's a sign of youthful curiosity.
Harnessing Amichail as a sounding board for ideas and pointing out any weakness in ideas seems more reasonable than scolding.