News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Java is Pass-by-Value, Dammit. Parent comment

Re:Java is Pass-by-Value, Dammit by mannykannot on Tuesday March 24, 2015 @07:52AM (#9255994)
The well-definedness of 'C++ pointer' is a non sequitur - it is not a sufficient condition to justify its use in this context. 'Backwardation' is well-defined, yet I doubt it can contribute anything to this discussion.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Java is Pass-by-Value, Dammit by jjnoakes on Wednesday March 25, 2015 @08:57AM (#9262572)
If you consider the context of my statement, and not my statement as it stands in isolation, then you are mistaken.
[ Parent | on HN ]