News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SpaceX's New Spin on Falcon 9 by eabraham on Thursday March 19, 2015 @03:22PM (#9234009)
Considering that the cheaper "used" launch cost will lower the bar for getting satellites to LEO, I wonder how long until we need to worry about Kessler Syndrome[1].

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler_syndrome

Re:SpaceX's New Spin on Falcon 9 by 32faction on Thursday March 19, 2015 @03:55PM (#9234193)
I did my undergraduate capstone class on the Kessler Syndrome. UNCOPUOS, the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space dictate that a satellite must deorbit itself within 25 years after mission completion.

The Kessler Syndrome right now is a potentially exponential problem that we should be conscientious of because our access to space depends on open orbital lanes.

I want to submit a YC application proposing an orbital debris mitigation as a service company but im not sure if it's an idea YC will facilitate

The science behind the movie Gravity wasn't too accurate but the scenario the characters found themselves in is very very plausible.

Re:SpaceX's New Spin on Falcon 9 by pqomdv on Thursday March 19, 2015 @03:29PM (#9234039)
I can't wait for junkyard micro-satellites equipped with an ion thruster. They are launched in the hundreds at a time, each locates their specific target, attaches and start a slow descend to burn in the atmosphere. This process is done automatically over a time-frame of months, since ion thrusters work slowly, which is great for automation.
Re:SpaceX's New Spin on Falcon 9 by Gravityloss on Thursday March 19, 2015 @06:36PM (#9235039)
there are even more efficient and cheaper ways for deorbiting than ion engines.
Re:SpaceX's New Spin on Falcon 9 by pqomdv on Friday March 20, 2015 @06:05AM (#9236843)
Can you elaborate?
Re:SpaceX's New Spin on Falcon 9 by TheLoneWolfling on Friday March 20, 2015 @12:09PM (#9238528)
Just a long wire would work.