News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SpaceX's New Spin on Falcon 9 by nickff on Thursday March 19, 2015 @01:06PM (#9233262)
We should put less focus on reusability, and pay more attention to labor (inspection and repair time) per launch. If you compare SpaceX and NASA under this paradigm, or by looking at launch cost per unit of mass, SpaceX has long since surpassed all other launch providers.

The shuttle had a number of issues, including design issues due to DoD requirements, engine pressure issues due to internal NASA priorities, and budget trade-offs due to Congressional directives. The most important lesson to take away from the shuttle is that returning the most costly components to earth does not necessarily translate into cost savings.

Re:SpaceX's New Spin on Falcon 9 by nicholasdrake on Thursday March 19, 2015 @01:23PM (#9233349)
'What percentage of a launch vehicle (rocket to space) do you think is the cost of labour? It's about 80-90%! It's labour!' Peter Diamandis, X-Prize
Re:SpaceX's New Spin on Falcon 9 by avmich on Thursday March 19, 2015 @11:49PM (#9236155)
Here is an example of how inspection could be done by professionals:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dWCI4S4fGg