AT&T not happy with Verizon ads: 'There's a lawsuit for that'

Re:AT&T not happy with Verizon ads: 'There's a lawsuit for t... by rriepe on Tuesday November 03, 2009 @09:42PM (#920800)

It's interesting that AT&T isn't disputing the lack of 3G coverage claim. Instead, they're stretching to say Verizon was implying something else with clearly-labeled maps.

Pretty inane. I doubt they'll win. It reflects pretty badly on them, too.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AT&T not happy with Verizon ads: 'There's a lawsuit for t... by jamesbressi on Tuesday November 03, 2009 @09:53PM (#920810)

Agreed. Total waste of AT&T's money to pursue this. Embarrassing on their part, if you ask me.

WAIT! Here's an idea: The money they are spending on legal for this lawsuit they could use to improve the network!

Ha, I know, that's just craaaaazy talk. Silly me.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AT&T not happy with Verizon ads: 'There's a lawsuit for t... by 100k on Wednesday November 04, 2009 @12:46AM (#921134)

Anyone who has driven across the US with an iPhone (or, hell, tried to use on in San Francisco) knows AT&T's 3G network is total crap. I don't think they win by fighting this characterization.

[ Parent | on HN ]