Re:Spolsky: Does Slow Growth Equal Slow Death?
by jister on Tuesday November 03, 2009 @09:34PM
(#920787)
Actually, I also find your first post sarcastic.
Re:Spolsky: Does Slow Growth Equal Slow Death?
by gruseom on Tuesday November 03, 2009 @10:52PM
(#920939)
I don't think you're technically allowed to find it sarcastic after the speaker explains that he meant what he said. Unless, of course, he's lying. But he isn't. Anyone who reads edw519 regularly (i.e. anyone who reads HN regularly) knows that's just how he is :)
p.s. edw, given your closing nosarcasm tag without an opening one, must we now assume that everything you've ever said was non-sarcastic?
Re:Spolsky: Does Slow Growth Equal Slow Death?
by edw519 on Wednesday November 04, 2009 @08:25AM
(#921601)
p.s. edw, given your closing nosarcasm tag without an opening one, must we now assume that everything you've ever said was non-sarcastic?
Only in ie6.
Re:Spolsky: Does Slow Growth Equal Slow Death?
by jshen on Tuesday November 03, 2009 @11:38PM
(#921018)
I think it's perfectly reasonable to believe that the words a person used did not clearly reflect the thoughts in their head. In fact, I'd say it's fairly common. Given that, one could be "technically allowed" to find it x even though the writer insists it's y. It surely didn't sound like a compliment to me when I read it.
Re:Spolsky: Does Slow Growth Equal Slow Death?
by gruseom on Tuesday November 03, 2009 @11:52PM
(#921047)
it's perfectly reasonable to believe that the words a person used did not clearly reflect the thoughts in their head
Sure, but that's by definition not sarcasm.
Re:Spolsky: Does Slow Growth Equal Slow Death?
by jongraehl on Wednesday November 04, 2009 @02:53AM
(#921287)
> Any reasonable person who takes your advice would be a fool if he bought from your competitor
This is almost certainly supposed to represent (the implication of) Joel's pitch, not edw's belief. I would definitely expect it to be read aloud in a sarcastic tone.
Re:Spolsky: Does Slow Growth Equal Slow Death?
by delackner on Thursday November 05, 2009 @07:40AM
(#923714)
Just a suggestion if you want people to infer the tone that you intend, but using words like "claim", and "disguise", and putting quotes around words that don't normally have them, all imply a judgemental tone of voice. Of course at the end of the day the written word is a lousy carrier of emotional signal, but that's why it is important to try to check that the tone of your writing matches the intended tone in your mind.
Re:Spolsky: Does Slow Growth Equal Slow Death?
by edw519 on Thursday November 05, 2009 @01:28PM
(#924378)
Thank you, delackner. I've been sitting here a little mystified at how something I posted was so easily misinterpreted. Then you provided some specific feedback. It took a day and a half, but it was worth the wait.
Re:Spolsky: Does Slow Growth Equal Slow Death?
by amouat on Tuesday November 10, 2009 @01:54PM
(#933655)
The funny thing is that this reads like sarcasm to me as well. I think it's just your very abrupt style. "It took a day and a half" implies it should have happened quicker and it's not your fault.
Please don't take this personally!
Re:Spolsky: Does Slow Growth Equal Slow Death?
by mistermann on Wednesday November 04, 2009 @02:12PM
(#922365)
I dunno, the fricking backlash whenever Joel and now even Jeff Atwood post anything related to their own projects is getting to the point of being absurd, personally, I don't know if I'd have the balls to post anything anymore if I was them, and if I did, I think I would also be prepared with a big FU to anyone who started with their petty little sniping. Reading the posts on the last coding horror blog makes me feel like the vast majority of the computing industry (or at least ones that participate on blogs) are just a bunch of whiny little college kids who really have no sense of the real world (once you are over 30, perhaps have a house and kids and other expenses that come with life).
Proceed with the downvotes.
Re:Spolsky: Does Slow Growth Equal Slow Death?
by scott_s on Wednesday November 04, 2009 @03:51PM
(#922554)
edw519's post doesn't look like "backlash" to me. Just a standard reaction.
Also, daring people to downvote you is obnoxious. Please don't do it.
What I didn't say in my original post was that this was an excellent example of generating interest in your business while contributing to the community at large, and that quite a few of us here can learn from it. But now, I'm afraid to give you another compliment because you may misinterpret it. (Oops, too late.)
There have been many times when my post was misunderstood because I accidently omitted the <sarcasm> tags. But this is the first time the inverse ever happened. Live and learn.
</nosarcasm>