News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Review of Graeber's Essay on “Bullshit Jobs” (2013) by zhte415 on Sunday March 15, 2015 @02:28AM (#9205590)
Link to the article discussed here: http://www.strikemag.org/bullshit-jobs/
Re:A Review of Graeber's Essay on “Bullshit Jobs” (2013) by rikibro on Sunday March 15, 2015 @08:39AM (#9206278)
<i>That the world would keep on turning if you weren’t doing that thing you do 9-5?</i>

Sorry for the off-topic, but is it normal to work from 9am to 5pm? Does this mean people have no lunch time, or they work "only" 7 hours?

Re:A Review of Graeber's Essay on “Bullshit Jobs” (2013) by camgunz on Sunday March 15, 2015 @10:46AM (#9206655)
Most places I've worked are 8-5 with an hour lunch. Like you, I don't know where 9-5 comes from.
Re:A Review of Graeber's Essay on “Bullshit Jobs” (2013) by throw_away on Sunday March 15, 2015 @06:17PM (#9208442)
It was a hit song in 1981: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/9_to_5_(Dolly_Parton_song)

it's shorthand for a tedious job.

Re:A Review of Graeber's Essay on “Bullshit Jobs” (2013) by camgunz on Monday March 16, 2015 @12:21AM (#9209844)
Yeah I know it's shorthand now, but I was trying to figure out where it came from and why.

I bit the bullet and googled it, and found out that people were just paid for lunch, or they weren't paid (37.5 hours a week, half hour lunch).