Re:A Review of Graeber's Essay on “Bullshit Jobs” (2013)
by zhte415 on Sunday March 15, 2015 @02:28AM
(#9205590)
Link to the article discussed here: http://www.strikemag.org/bullshit-jobs/
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A Review of Graeber's Essay on “Bullshit Jobs” (2013)
by rikibro on Sunday March 15, 2015 @08:39AM
(#9206278)
<i>That the world would keep on turning if you weren’t doing that thing you do 9-5?</i>
Sorry for the off-topic, but is it normal to work from 9am to 5pm? Does this mean people have no lunch time, or they work "only" 7 hours?
Re:A Review of Graeber's Essay on “Bullshit Jobs” (2013)
by camgunz on Sunday March 15, 2015 @10:46AM
(#9206655)
Most places I've worked are 8-5 with an hour lunch. Like you, I don't know where 9-5 comes from.
Re:A Review of Graeber's Essay on “Bullshit Jobs” (2013)
by throw_away on Sunday March 15, 2015 @06:17PM
(#9208442)
It was a hit song in 1981: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/9_to_5_(Dolly_Parton_song)
it's shorthand for a tedious job.
Re:A Review of Graeber's Essay on “Bullshit Jobs” (2013)
by camgunz on Monday March 16, 2015 @12:21AM
(#9209844)
Yeah I know it's shorthand now, but I was trying to figure out where it came from and why.
I bit the bullet and googled it, and found out that people were just paid for lunch, or they weren't paid (37.5 hours a week, half hour lunch).