News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A success story for Haxe by benologist on Saturday March 14, 2015 @09:30PM (#9204967)
It's still reproducible just by substituting the top function for the stable alternative we use: http://pastebin.com/D3S6SYBM. Haxe 3.1.3 on OSX.
Re:A success story for Haxe by jonasmalaco on Saturday March 14, 2015 @10:31PM (#9205109)
Do you have the same problem with a deterministic comparison function?

I'm not dismissing the existence of a bug just because of this (although the issue may be related to it), but non-deterministic comparison functions are problematic with many sort _algorithms_. You might experience (other) problems when using implementation independent "sort" APIs, since many algorithms need to rerun the comparison function several times and expect consistent behaviour; I would expect certain algorithms to, for instance, never complete.

Re:A success story for Haxe by benologist on Saturday March 14, 2015 @11:09PM (#9205202)
The haxe people are the ones you need to discuss it further with. My pastebin expires in a week so you might want to clone it before you link to it.
Re:A success story for Haxe by jonasmalaco on Sunday March 15, 2015 @03:25PM (#9207702)
Hm... No.
Re:A success story for Haxe by benologist on Sunday March 15, 2015 @09:32PM (#9209192)
I don't want to attach myself to further discussion of it, but it is still a crash reasonably isolated to their standard library and I took the time to document it so that my feedback could be helpful. If you don't pass it on they will miss this opportunity to improve their platform.