News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Scholarly Markdown by fiddlosopher on Saturday March 14, 2015 @09:07PM (#9204912)
"For example, they do not plan to add syntax highlighting blocks (the ```some code``` on GitHub) to their implementation, because they believe that it is outside the scope of markdown."

To correct the record, fenced code blocks have been there from the beginning: http://spec.commonmark.org/0.18/#fenced-code-blocks.

Re:A Scholarly Markdown by netheril96 on Saturday March 14, 2015 @11:17PM (#9205225)
I guess many has changed since I last looked at CommonMark and perhaps the developers are pragmatic after all. I stand corrected and will try out their implementations now.