Re:Wikipedia Bitcoin Statistics
by contingencies on Saturday March 14, 2015 @07:57AM
(#9202319)
Yes. I stopped contributing to the article because it turned in to this sort of thing, and had achieved my immediate purpose of making it exist and stay existing. I suggest you also learn to manage your time, as your posts while impressive and reasonable do not represent a healthy degree of interest to display in a passing piece of minutiae. Sarcasm can be hard to pick up, but at least you got the RPG/fantasy reference. :)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Wikipedia Bitcoin Statistics
by ericfontaine on Saturday March 14, 2015 @12:18PM
(#9203091)
:)
It is not minutiae when someone phrases their posts in a manner that may imply they're taking credit for other people's work.
I didn't mind spending a few minutes because I respect all wikipedians who created and maintained the bitcoin article.
I wanted to help you understand, but now see it is futile. I would hope that the Wikipedia personality whose name is the abbreviation of the enlightened Pratyekabuddha ("a lone buddha", "a buddha on their own" or "a private buddha" [1]) would understand, but apparently I am talking to the personality "contingencies".