News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What should the next Aaron Swartz do when the DOJ knocks? by kaishiro on Friday March 13, 2015 @01:55AM (#9195824)
Yeah, I'm also somewhat perplexed by what point you're trying to get across here. You're saying that you agree that normal people commit felonies, so the answer is to "not be normal"?

Just looking for some clarification. Thanks.

Re:What should the next Aaron Swartz do when the DOJ knocks? by LLWM on Friday March 13, 2015 @10:08AM (#9197136)
Yes. I don't find "most people do it" to be a convincing excuse for personal flaws.
Re:What should the next Aaron Swartz do when the DOJ knocks? by supdog on Friday March 13, 2015 @10:46AM (#9197364)
Would you find that "most people commit felonies (without harm)" to be convincing evidence of policy flaws?
Re:What should the next Aaron Swartz do when the DOJ knocks? by LLWM on Friday March 13, 2015 @11:48AM (#9197749)
That claim is logically impossible. If most people were committing felonies without harm, that would lend plausible deniability to harmful felons, thus indirectly causing harm.
Re:What should the next Aaron Swartz do when the DOJ knocks? by supdog on Friday March 13, 2015 @12:26PM (#9197999)
Or the claim is highly probable, if bad policy was systemically painting peaceful people as felons. If so, what then is the root cause of the harm?
Re:What should the next Aaron Swartz do when the DOJ knocks? by LLWM on Friday March 13, 2015 @12:59PM (#9198215)
Asking about the root cause of the harm only has meaning if there is harm being caused.
Re:What should the next Aaron Swartz do when the DOJ knocks? by supdog on Friday March 13, 2015 @03:06PM (#9199243)
Indeed.
Re:What should the next Aaron Swartz do when the DOJ knocks? by LLWM on Friday March 13, 2015 @03:51PM (#9199564)
Glad to see you've come round.
Re:What should the next Aaron Swartz do when the DOJ knocks? by supdog on Friday March 13, 2015 @06:23PM (#9200471)
Have I? Or have we?