News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why Go? Use Racket. Parent comment

Re:Why Go? Use Racket by sheepmullet on Thursday March 12, 2015 @04:16PM (#9193552)
In the study you linked to Clojure code is basically as bug free as Haskell and Scala code and Erlang code isn't far behind.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Go? Use Racket by lomnakkus on Thursday March 12, 2015 @04:40PM (#9193729)
As I recall they conclude that the general stats show that "static-functional" is more bug-free than "dynamic-functional" which is more bug-free than "static-procedural/dynamic-procedural", which is more bug-free than...

As I said, I'm not sure I buy into the whole design/classification/statistical scheme of the study myself, so YMMV.

[ Parent | on HN ]