News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NTP's Fate Hinges on 'Father Time' by noselasd on Thursday March 12, 2015 @06:19AM (#9189912)
Indeed. e.g. ntpd has support for quite a lot of different hardware - which is important, someone must be a stratum 1 server.
Re:NTP's Fate Hinges on 'Father Time' by nullc on Thursday March 12, 2015 @11:47AM (#9191495)
Stratum 1 support doesn't require a lot of different hardware, arguably it requires less: you need only a PPS device; which has become increasingly generic due to the kernel support needed for precise timestamping. (okay sure, you also need to initially name the second, but you can have another NTP server do that).
Re:NTP's Fate Hinges on 'Father Time' by vidarh on Thursday March 12, 2015 @10:08AM (#9190859)
But perhaps it does not make sense for all of these to considerations to be taken care of by a single package.

E.g. perhaps it makes sense to have an entirely separately client-only package with a separate codebase.

Re:NTP's Fate Hinges on 'Father Time' by gpvos on Thursday March 12, 2015 @11:19AM (#9191293)
That is exactly what PHK plans to do with ntimed: split it up into separate packages for clients, time distribution servers and authoritative time transmitters.