News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:2015 Chromebook Pixel by semi-extrinsic on Thursday March 12, 2015 @05:15AM (#9189713)
True. Although I think it would be much better for durability if Apple used the same wire/power brick layout as everyone else: have the power brick in the middle of the wire, accepting 120/240 V from a standard "figure-eight" cord. Then that cord would be the one that breaks, and they cost $1 to replace. Of course this conflicts with Apple's business model...
Re:2015 Chromebook Pixel by iSnow on Thursday March 12, 2015 @08:25AM (#9190278)
At least over here in Europe, you can attach a bog-standard 240V cord to the Apple power brick so it sits in the middle of the cord. However, this does not help if the computer-side plug does not disengage if your lovely child barrels down your living room.

Magsafe has prevented a costly fall or other here.

Re:2015 Chromebook Pixel by kalleboo on Thursday March 12, 2015 @09:54AM (#9190760)
All the Apple laptop and iPad adapters I've gotten accept a standard figure-8 cord if you just slide off the national plug. For my it's the slim cord between the charger and the machine that wears out.
Re:2015 Chromebook Pixel by semi-extrinsic on Thursday March 12, 2015 @11:43AM (#9191459)
Interesting. I've never seen anyone using it with the figure-8 cord. My intuition was that having the adapter stuck to the wall tends to often bend the thin cord on the DC side. As you say, that's what usually fails.