I think that's an effective commentary on how those outside the group see it defined, rather than one on how the group defines membership.
It's also a commentary on the limits of certain political lenses.
It's also a commentary on the limits of certain political lenses.
And let's be honest, this isn't a problem if the $GROUP is a bunch of people hanging out in their living room or grabbing a beer once a week, but it does become a problem when the $GROUP is making hiring decisions or when $GROUP decides to harass someone online. Then it is those subconscious selectors that define the group and its members more than the how the $GROUP thinks it defines itself.