Personally, I'm not outraged because I "should be." I'm mildly annoyed at the person in question, and I'm outraged at all the people coming out of the woodwork to defend him.
It's not that they never change their minds, it's more that they usually don't. Especially after telling someone officially they're rejected. If a company rejected me then phoned me up two days later saying they changed their minds I wouldn't look too favourably on them.
"I'm mildly annoyed at the person in question, and I'm outraged at all the people coming out of the woodwork to defend him."
Personally I just think he's a weirdo who's clearly not that smart. But I've seen some people call him a "sexual criminal". I'm like WTF! That's a bit extreme. That's the sort of thing the outrage culture is describing.
It has nothing to do with normality, just potential.
I haven't seen "sexual criminal" but rest assured that I'd object as strongly to that as I object to all the people defending this guy.
Very unlikely for a start up that'll you'll interview again for a different position. They would just offer you the other position. Also very unlikely is a rejection turned into acceptance.
"We are not talking about a culture where someone got fired for "forking" jokes. That may be the culture, but it's completely unrelated to the issue being discussed here."
That is exactly what the person was talking about and this thread is very much the same. A bunch of people outraged because they should be.