Gigaom Closes Down

Re:Gigaom Closes Down by vonnik on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @02:05AM (#9176305)

I'm not sure that all the examples you cite are evidence of very successful and profitable media companies. ReadWriteWeb was acquired by SAY Media for less than $5M and they cut it loose two years later. HuffPo wasn't turning a profit for AOL in 2013, and Tim Armstrong wouldn't say in Dec. 2014 if it was earning a profit, which basically means it's not. In any case, HuffPo's revenue is largely driven by rehashing the original reporting of other outlets, and that is definitely not sustainable journalism.

[0]http://techcrunch.com/2014/11/13/say-media-selling-off-readw... [1]http://www.businessinsider.com/aol-huffington-post-profit-20... [2]http://www.businessinsider.com/huffington-post-over-200m-rev...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Gigaom Closes Down by nikcub on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @08:22AM (#9177301)

RWW operated for 8 years with no money raised and then cashed out when Richard retired. HuffPo makes more in revenue p.a than what AOL paid for it. They may have only technically not been profitable at acquisition because of their reinvestment in business. There are a ton of other profitable, bootstrapped media businesses - I just happen to know those I mentioned.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Gigaom Closes Down by vonnik on Saturday March 14, 2015 @06:05PM (#9204364)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2015/03/1...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Gigaom Closes Down by declan on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @02:59AM (#9176435)

<nikcub> is certainly right about the dangers of raising venture capital as a media company. Few news organizations generate outsize returns.

In terms of companies sold, there's also CNET, which was sold for $1.8B to CBS in 2008. That was after an operating loss of $6M in 1Q 2008.

[ Parent | on HN ]