News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Silent Circle canary missing declaration? by jamiesonbecker on Saturday March 07, 2015 @01:18PM (#9162529)
Assuming that a judge would go so far as to compel them to make a false statement, which would be unconstitutional.
Re:Silent Circle canary missing declaration? by tedunangst on Saturday March 07, 2015 @02:35PM (#9162826)
I like how on the one hand we have people talking about secret courts and the government wantonly ignoring the constitution whenever it pleases them, and then on the other hand we have arguments that a pedantic technicality will somehow prevent the government from getting what it wants.
Re:Silent Circle canary missing declaration? by bhouston on Saturday March 07, 2015 @01:41PM (#9162615)
Are you sure there is a law again making false statements to the general public? I think police lie all the time in sting operations or as undercover ops.
Re:Silent Circle canary missing declaration? by maxerickson on Saturday March 07, 2015 @01:48PM (#9162636)
It's the compelling that is ostensibly unconstitutional.
Re:Silent Circle canary missing declaration? by spiritplumber on Saturday March 07, 2015 @07:33PM (#9163826)
I think the current US law is that lawmen can try to compel you to not discuss a subject, and try to jail you if you do, however, they cannot try to tell you to speak falsehoods about a subject.
Re:Silent Circle canary missing declaration? by a3n on Saturday March 07, 2015 @02:20PM (#9162765)
Could a judge compel someone to give over access to the canary system, so that law enforcement would be the one falsely updating the canary? IAdefinitelyNAL, I've seen mentioned here and there that the police are allowed to lie while carrying out their investigations and duties.
Re:Silent Circle canary missing declaration? by comrade1 on Saturday March 07, 2015 @01:40PM (#9162611)
Do you mean a false statement in public? Or in a court of law?