Re:SpaceX Profitable as Musk Pulls in NASA Contracts, Google...
by frandroid on Wednesday March 04, 2015 @03:54PM
(#9147260)
The business model in a self-driving car is THE SELF-DRIVING CAR...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SpaceX Profitable as Musk Pulls in NASA Contracts, Google...
by manicdee on Wednesday March 04, 2015 @06:58PM
(#9148321)
… that deliberately takes routes which maximise your exposure to its owners advertising, services and products.
Re:SpaceX Profitable as Musk Pulls in NASA Contracts, Google...
by edgyswingset on Wednesday March 04, 2015 @04:10PM
(#9147377)
... unless they're interested in taking in a loss for each vehicle or only selling to the richest people in the world.
Re:SpaceX Profitable as Musk Pulls in NASA Contracts, Google...
by jdpage on Wednesday March 04, 2015 @05:17PM
(#9147768)
The business model for the self-driving car is a computer-scheduled, dynamically-provisioned taxi service cheap enough that nobody needs to own a car in the city. Because self-driving cars don't need to park (they can just move on to the next assignment or deprovision), if they catch on then in-city parking decks can be redeveloped into business space or park space.
Re:SpaceX Profitable as Musk Pulls in NASA Contracts, Google...
by lazaroclapp on Wednesday March 04, 2015 @06:22PM
(#9148140)
You forget transportation of goods. Pretty much all over-land cargo in the U.S. and most of that elsewhere (less so, because trains) could be transported by self-driving cars/drones. Not sure if that is larger or smaller than transportation of people at this point, but it's still an astronomically huge market.
Re:SpaceX Profitable as Musk Pulls in NASA Contracts, Google...
by eru on Wednesday March 04, 2015 @10:38PM
(#9149095)
US is actually pretty big in freight trains.
Mostly because, freight and passenger trains interfere badly. No passengers = easier freight. A big wave of deregulation of the market a few decades ago helped, too. The Economist ran a special about the US market a few years ago.