News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:“Just remove the duck” (2013) by inthewoods on Tuesday March 03, 2015 @12:49PM (#9139215)
So right on about doing the same thing by accident.

Early in my life, I programmed synths in a studio - and I practiced a variation on this. I would listen to what sound they wanted, then I would play them something that was likely pretty close. They they would complain about it not being quite right, so I would play 3 or 4 different sounds that I knew were completely wrong, then return to the first sound. To which they would invariably say "yeah that one - that's perfect!"

Re:“Just remove the duck” (2013) by JonnieCache on Tuesday March 03, 2015 @12:53PM (#9139245)
>So right on about doing the same thing by accident.

There is nothing that can describe the mixture of confusion, shame, and artistic/technical self-doubt that you feel upon realising that the compressor you just spent half an hour lovingly tweaking, to seemingly great effect, is bypassed.

Re:“Just remove the duck” (2013) by inthewoods on Tuesday March 03, 2015 @01:15PM (#9139440)
Yes! Perfectly captured.
Re:“Just remove the duck” (2013) by dilap on Tuesday March 03, 2015 @01:16PM (#9139444)
I could believe that the original sound actually does seem different after the 3 or 4 other sounds were priming the brain. Our senses don't operate in isolation. Just think of #thedress, or a note played in isolation vs played after a sequence of notes in a key in which the original note does not appear.
Re:“Just remove the duck” (2013) by digi_owl on Tuesday March 03, 2015 @03:30PM (#9140502)
And this kind of stuff is what MP3 etc are built around. But try to get that past the -philes...