Re:Pentagon’s $55B mystery plane is secret, but debate on co...
by madaxe_again on Tuesday March 03, 2015 @09:01AM
(#9137629)
What died up your arse? The link is right there. Would you like me to click it for you?
Re:Pentagon’s $55B mystery plane is secret, but debate on co...
by johnnyyousef on Tuesday March 03, 2015 @10:53AM
(#9138273)
I don't have a problem with the link or reading it myself.
I have a problem with 'Aw, c'mon, nobody has mentioned Aurora yet?'. What do you mean by 'Aw, c'mon'? That's an illiterate sentence. And why say 'nobody has mentioned it yet?' Why ask that question? Why not check for yourself if anyone has mentioned it yet?
What you probably meant was 'This may be related to the Aurora project [link]'.
Re:Pentagon’s $55B mystery plane is secret, but debate on co...
by madaxe_again on Tuesday March 03, 2015 @01:10PM
(#9139378)
Yet you start a sentence with "And", use single quotes inappropriately, and add absolutely nothing to the discussion, whereas I, colloquialisms notwithstanding, did.
Go and do something productive with your time - this isn't, and I'd bet it's just annoying both of us.
Re:Pentagon’s $55B mystery plane is secret, but debate on co...
by johnjackamend on Tuesday March 03, 2015 @01:52PM
(#9139733)
Not being able to start a sentence with "And" is actually quite common and is found in vast amounts of professional writing. And if that wasn't true this sentence wouldn't make sense.
What on earth does that?
"nobody has mentioned Aurora yet?" you've obviously checked nobody mentioned it, so why not just give us the link and say how it's relevant.
"Aw, c'mon" what the hell is that? Who talks like that? What does "aw" mean? You're disappointed nobody has mentioned something is relevant? Why does that upset you? Why shorten "c'mon" from "come on" like that?
Why post this nonsense? Just give us the link and why it's relevant.