Re:Machine intelligence, part 2
by pgodzin on Monday March 02, 2015 @08:16PM
(#9135548)
Are you suggesting that's what we should do in the face of this potential threat?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
If we a seriously believe AI is an extinction level risk, and getting there more slowly might improve our chances, then it seems like we should try anything with a good chance of working. I think this has a better chance of working than regulating AI research itself, since chip manufacturing is centralized and highly visible, whereas AI research could be advanced in secret by a few people in a room. Much easier to successfully regulate the former than the latter.