News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Machine intelligence, part 2 by frabcus on Monday March 02, 2015 @06:23PM (#9135083)
The US Government regulates all sorts of things that keep you safe - from pollution of your water supply through to seatbelts.

It's not perfect, and it often fails at regulation. But your post doesn't give any help to understanding when it succeeds and when it fails.

Re:Machine intelligence, part 2 by baddox on Monday March 02, 2015 @06:49PM (#9135222)
The trouble with evaluating regulations is that if you attribute positive effects directly to government regulations (e.g. "regulation X saved Y lives by keeping dangerous drug Z off the market"), it's only fair to also attribute negative effects directly to government regulations (e.g. "regulation X killed Y people by delaying the introduction of miracle drug Z to the market"). And even beyond that, you also need to analyze the costs of the regulatory system itself if you want to make conclusions about the net effects of the regulatory system as a whole.
Re:Machine intelligence, part 2 by pgodzin on Monday March 02, 2015 @08:01PM (#9135505)
But those are regulating current products or services. This is calling for regulation now of RESEARCH in a specific field.