News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote by mehwoot on Thursday February 26, 2015 @09:37PM (#9116880)
I think at least part of it is because the people on HN enjoy solving problems so much.

Or we're all cynical assholes. Just possibly.

Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote by Thimothy on Friday February 27, 2015 @02:33AM (#9117652)
I'd rather "Idealistic Perfectionist", thank you.
Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote by asdkl234890 on Friday February 27, 2015 @02:11AM (#9117580)
I think it's because we are pedantic. In a pedantic way no more world hunger, but people still die in car crashes, is correct. Pedantically correct.
Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote by lallysingh on Friday February 27, 2015 @11:17AM (#9119609)
Well, which comment would you upvote?

1) Yay! 2) Here's where they could have done more...

Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote by doktrin on Saturday February 28, 2015 @12:53PM (#9124394)
Or overly pedantic alpha nerds, the lot of us.
Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote by Terr_ on Thursday February 26, 2015 @10:25PM (#9117007)
"Por qué no los dos!?"
Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote by innguest on Friday February 27, 2015 @11:14AM (#9119586)
> Or we're all cynical assholes. Just possibly.

Unlikely. HNers are wide-eyed Utopians in the Platonic fashion of believing in virtue through central planning. There is no cynicism here to be found, but in the downvoted comments.

Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote by slowmovintarget on Friday February 27, 2015 @01:17PM (#9120354)
Not a fan of centralized control... I much prefer distributed, concurrent, fault-tolerant, scalable systems. You'd think most HN readership would too.