News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote. Parent comment

Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote by meragrin on Thursday February 26, 2015 @04:12PM (#9115528)
How is it relevant information that a certain topic brought in a new person? I could understand it if the person had been around a few years and only commented on that topic, but a new person could be just a recently inspired person.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote by unethical_ban on Thursday February 26, 2015 @04:24PM (#9115604)
This is a politically charged topic with powerful, malicious actors. The thread an unusually large number of green members posting mostly against what HN has been mostly for.

It's an odd pattern, and the parent above saying it's "vile" to call it what it looks like is overblowing it.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:FCC Passes Strict Net Neutrality Regulations on 3-2 Vote by meragrin on Thursday February 26, 2015 @05:13PM (#9115925)
I'm not seeing that pattern. I've seen a total of 7 green members on this topic. That to me isn't all that unusual. The vast majority of green I saw was for NN. Are you saying HN is against NN? I thought HN was for NN.
[ Parent | on HN ]